Lv 1
登录后阅读更多资料
|
来自 亚太地区
本帖最后由 mostakimseo09 于 2022-9-28 19:08 编辑
Which produces a hybrid effect which does not allow to distinguish in the work its most significant characteristic its photographic quality. There has been a lot of discussion in recent years as to whether or not photography should be considered an artistic work worthy of comparison with the other plastic arts. There are divergences between those who consider it a means of expression like the others and the myopic ones who look at this century with the eyes of the century being unable to distinguish the most important aspects of our technological civilization.
But those of us who use the camera as an instrument e-commerce photo editing of the trade like a painter uses his brushes are not interested in contrary opinions because we enjoy the approval of those who recognize the multiple functions of to fix and record the time. That is why it is not essential to know if photography is an art or not. What counts is distinguishing between good and bad photography. Good is one that accepts the limits of photographic technique and takes advantage of the possibilities and characteristics that the medium offers.
Bad is that photograph made with an inferiority complex not recognizing the specific value of the medium and resorting to all kinds of imitations. These works give the impression that the author is almost ashamed to photograph reality and tries to hide the photographic essence of the work by superimposing tricks and forgeries. Photography because it can only be done on the present and on what exists objectively in front of the camera is affirmed as the most incisive means to record real life in each of its manifestations. Hence its documentary value.
|
|