教游戏 - 游戏源码 - 手游源码 - 服务端 - 一键端 - 架设教程 - 源码编译 - 教游戏论坛

搜索
查看: 44|回复: 0

Is the Payment for Knowledge Already Cool?

[复制链接]

升级   10%

1

主题

1

帖子

5

积分
发表于 2022-9-22 17:18:13 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
本帖最后由 rakibhasan48 于 2022-9-22 17:20 编辑

Knowledge payment has been hot in 2016 and 2017, and it is still an industry model that many people in the industry respect in 2018. According to the public data of the short book review, at the end of last year, the number of users of the "knowledge payment" platform alone was close to 50 million, and the number of users willing to pay for knowledge skyrocketed by three times. Represented by the well-known "Road to Wealth Freedom", "Jianqi Financial Notebook", "Elite Daily Class" and other courses related to financial management and workplace, they have attracted much attention in the past two years, and the star demonstration effect has made similar courses.

Courses related to financial management, workplace, and growth have sprung up on every platform like mushrooms after a spring rain. The mainstream evaluation of knowledge-based payment platforms and content Phone Number List has begun to turn from prosperity to decline, and there are more and more negative media reports about "knowledge-based payment". "Paying for knowledge can only solve the anxiety of urban white-collar workers, and it has little practical significance", which has become a new mainstream view on knowledge-paying content.



The reason is that more and more users find that whether it is investment or the workplace, reading the columns of some big names does not allow us to truly achieve "wealth freedom" or a significant improvement in the workplace. In seemingly endless learning. And gradually feel tired of the payment process. Many users began to wonder if the problem was with them? But is this fragmented model of paying for knowledge really valuable to us? Data decline and poor reputation have gradually become the norm. So much so that when the head We-Media Mi Meng launched "Mimeng Teach You a Monthly Salary of 50,000", it encountered a one-sided negative evaluation.



回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表